redead כתב:
לא יודע אם כתבו את זה כבר
850 אלף יורו זאת לא הייתה הדרישה מלכתחילה מלפני חודש או יותר?
אולי הטקטיקה הכבירה והמשא ומתן המרשים היו כדי למשוך זמן ולחסוך בנתיים חודש משכורת לבחור.......
הדרישה המקורית היא 1,000,000 יורו. וכתוב בספורט5 שזה נסגר על 750,000 יורו. באתר הרשמי של ליליסטרום רשום שהעברה נסגרה, אבל לא מצויין הסכום ככה שאי אפשר לדעת.
האשכול על נוסא בפורום אוהדים שלהם מכיל יותר מ- 70 עמודים, מעיון בעמודים האחרונים כמה ציטוטים מעניינים בתרגום לאנגלית:
ציטוט:
If it's true that we have 20%, such as the RB report, it is quite nice. If he showers off a bit in the EL and stabilize, so he can quickly go for a 50-60 million next time. Then roll it quickly into a 8-9 to us.
ציטוט:
"The right, Nosa, had been using the situation to become the best winger in the country here. When you only had one more leg to stand on when you eventually become small fish in a big pond. Sadly you fail to see must surely soon be documented and proven that Nosa is best as a central midfielder and that this is one of the best for the team. I think it's provocative when Berg started at once put him on edge, considering the alternatives that have been used centrally. Battle against Tromsø had been lost without Nosa centrally in the second half. I think it's sad if he disappear already. The club should have some ice in your stomach and keep him out the year. If he continues to play as well as he did last time, this can be NOK for a medal. disappear he is I'm sure the team plummet to the bottom half. If this club really think with party talks about that you should create a topplaag, one can not always sell the best players as soon as it is an offer on a paltry million. If you lose NOK Attraction to the public's continue to decline. It is the "artists" people want to see on the pitch, not only sturdy toilers who is best without the ball. I think the club's strategy is unclear. If you really want to be a top team again? It is difficult or impossible to recreate the winning culture from the glory days when you are so defensive in the statement, including Berg: "We can not afford to compete with other Norwegian clubs, we must use the money we earn on any sales to pay old debts. " "We are still under development, and we have young players who still have much to learn." He might as well say that when they are fully trained so we sell them, and develops new plays from the bottom. It is the equivalent to scramble back to the start of Monopoly and receive 2000 $ and start again. It does not create a top side with such a strategy. At best, remain Mon Mediterranean hazards that are neither attractive to the public, media and sponsors. I miss that some dare to say: We will be the best in Norway, winning the league on a regular basis and make money through regular participation in Europe,
ציטוט:
Double his salary - get him to get out the season. It's sure more attractive clubs on the pitch and the selling price will certainly be raised (I think we should be able to claim 20M +/-). Moreover, we will benefit from his end of the season before we find new gold in Africa. Okay, he's a little "immature" in their behavior - but who is fully developed socially as a 20 year old? Not many.
ציטוט:
I believe that Nosa was at least 100% better in the 2nd game where he played center in the path, than in 1 where he played on the left side. If not many times better.
Hope Berg looks the same, and let him play center with Obiefule frammover (if he is the club well to note).
Nosa think will flourish in the center of the pitch.
ציטוט:
Very disappointing, but perhaps necessary to focus on the sport again. For me it is certainly very significant that he would rather to Israel, it smells like trouble for RBK long way. The noises they had with him they sold to Hanover may soon become a stale breeze in comparison. Nosa may be the origin of a number of new ridge-quote in the media, there is far less headroom to stand out. In the lower northern Norway, he must build a network of contacts all over again too. Bye, Nosa!
התחבר
הרשמה
שאלות נפוצות
חיפוש
